Asemani v. Attorney General of the United States
This text of 292 F. App'x 248 (Asemani v. Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Billy G. Asemani seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. Asemani seeks a declaration that the Attorney General is the proper respondent in his § 2241 proceedings. In the underlying petition, he requested that the Attorney General notify the Maryland State Division of Corrections that Asemani will not be taken into federal custody for removal purposes following completion of his state sentence because he is a United States national. He denies, however, that his § 2241 petition is an effort to seek review of his removal proceedings, and he seeks no relief from Maryland prison officials. Because the relief sought by Asemani is inextricably intertwined with his removal proceedings, and the district court did not have jurisdiction over those proceedings, it properly declined to issue an advisory opinion regarding the proper respondent or Asemani’s nationality. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asemani-v-attorney-general-of-the-united-states-ca4-2008.