Asemani v. Ahmadinejad

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Asemani v. Ahmadinejad. Read the opinion of the Court — 389 F. App'x 224
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2010·No. 10-6634·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6634

BILLY G. ASEMANI,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MAHMOOD AHMADINEJAD, (Former Head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps in Tehran); GHOLAM-NEZI NAQDI, Brigadier General (Former Senior Tehran Police Official); ALI KHAMENEI, (The “Supreme” Leader of the Islamic Revolution),

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00874-RDB)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 3, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his action under the Alien Torts Statute, 28 U.S.C. §

1350 (2006) and the Torture Victim Protection Act, P.L. 102-256,

106 Stat. 73. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Asemani v. Ahmadinejad, No. 1:10-cv-00874-RDB (D. Md.

Apr. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Asemani v. Ahmadinejad, (4th Cir. 2010).

Asemani v. Ahmadinejad (Asemani v. Ahmadinejad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alien's action for tort
28 U.S.C. § 1350