Aschenbach v. Inhabitants of Plainfield
8 A.2d 579, 123 N.J.L. 265, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 376
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aschenbach v. Inhabitants of Plainfield, 8 A.2d 579, 123 N.J.L. 265, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 376 (N.J. 1939).
8 A.2d 579 (Aschenbach v. Inhabitants of Plainfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beirn v. Morris
103 A.2d 361 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
Adams Theatre Co. v. Keenan
96 A.2d 519 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Tzeses v. Bd. of Trustees of South Orange
91 A.2d 588 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Shipman v. Town of Montclair
84 A.2d 652 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Stolz v. Ellenstein
81 A.2d 476 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1951)
Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Borough of Rutherford
73 A.2d 545 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)
Marrocco v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of Passaic
68 A.2d 470 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)