Asche-Bandor Corp. v. Bruckman

269 A.D. 681
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 9, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 681 (Asche-Bandor Corp. v. Bruckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Asche-Bandor Corp. v. Bruckman, 269 A.D. 681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The reasons assigned in our Per Curium opinion in Matter of Nicholas & Co. v. Bruckman (ante, p. 681, decided herewith) annulling the determination of the State Liquor Authority, apply with equal force here. . The Deputy Commissioner properly recommended the dismissal of all three charges. Why it was necessary to receive hearsay evidence as to alleged conversations with one Levin who was actually present in the hearing room is difficult to understand. Levin was not called by the State Liquor Authority as a witness.

[682]*682Since the determination of the State Liquor Authority is not supported by any substantial evidence, it should be annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Qlennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ., concur.

Determination of the State Liquor Authority of the State of New York unanimously annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baird v. State Liquor Authority
277 A.D.2d 60 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asche-bandor-corp-v-bruckman-nyappdiv-1945.