Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided December 14, 2022·No. 4:21-cv-00434·Unknown

Opinion

Ascension Arizona dba Carondelet St.) No. CV 21-434-TUC-JAS (BGM) Joseph’s Hospital, ) ) ORDER Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Amerisure Insurance Company, et al. Defendants. 1] Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. ] As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) 1s accepted and adopted; (2) The motion to remand (Doc. 27) is denied. Dated this 14th day of December, 2022. ark, Honorable James A. Soto United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated, (D. Ariz. 2022).

Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated (Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp.
170 F.3d 734 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)