Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated
Opinion
Ascension Arizona dba Carondelet St.) No. CV 21-434-TUC-JAS (BGM) Joseph’s Hospital, ) ) ORDER Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Amerisure Insurance Company, et al. Defendants. 1] Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. ] As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) 1s accepted and adopted; (2) The motion to remand (Doc. 27) is denied. Dated this 14th day of December, 2022. ark, Honorable James A. Soto United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated (Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.