Ascencion Chon Vidal and Adrianna Perez Vidal v. Rebecca Pedroza Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ascencion Chon Vidal and Adrianna Perez Vidal v. Rebecca Pedroza Anderson

DecidedMay 19, 2022

Docket11-20-00162-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Ascencion Chon Vidal and Adrianna Perez Vidal v. Rebecca Pedroza Anderson (Ascencion Chon Vidal and Adrianna Perez Vidal v. Rebecca Pedroza Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ascencion Chon Vidal and Adrianna Perez Vidal v. Rebecca Pedroza Anderson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Ascencion Chon Vidal and * From the 326th District Court Adrianna Perez Vidal, of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 19-13980N

Vs. No. 11-20-00162-CV * May 19, 2022

Rebecca Pedroza Anderson, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court concerning its issuance of the family- violence protective order. We reverse the order of the trial court as to the duration of the protective order, and we remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 50% against Rebecca Pedroza Anderson, and because Ascencion Chon Vidal and Adrianna Perez Vidal have been determined to be indigent, no costs are taxed against them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 43.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Ascencion Chon Vidal and * From the 326th District Court Adrianna Perez Vidal, of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 19-13980N

Vs. No. 11-20-00162-CV * May 19, 2022

Rebecca Pedroza Anderson, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court concerning its issuance of the family- violence protective order. We reverse the order of the trial court as to the duration of the protective order, and we remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 50% against Rebecca Pedroza Anderson, and because Ascencion Chon Vidal and Adrianna Perez Vidal have been determined to be indigent, no costs are taxed against them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 43.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ascencion Chon Vidal and Adrianna Perez Vidal v. Rebecca Pedroza Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ascencion-chon-vidal-and-adrianna-perez-vidal-v-rebecca-pedroza-anderson-texapp-2022.