Asbury v. City of Roanoke

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 4, 2009
• Docket: 09-1375
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1375

GEORGETTE R. ASBURY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CITY OF ROANOKE,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00272-gec-pms)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Georgette R. Asbury, Appellant Pro Se. William Michael Hackworth, Timothy Ross Spencer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Georgette R. Asbury appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this action

filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Asbury v. City of Roanoke, No. 7:08-cv-00272-gec-pms (W.D. Va.

Feb. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED