Asbury v. City of Roanoke

Fourth Circuit

Asbury v. City of Roanoke

330 F. App'x 39

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2009·No. No. 09-1375·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Georgette R. Asbury appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Asbury v. City of Roanoke, 599 F.Supp.2d 712 (W.D.Va.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Georgette R. Asbury appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Asbury v. City of Roanoke, 599 F.Supp.2d 712 (W.D.Va.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Asbury v. City of Roanoke, 330 F. App'x 39 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

330 F. App'x 39 (Asbury v. City of Roanoke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related