Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals

1997 Ohio 272, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1229

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1997

Docket1995-2495

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1997 Ohio 272 (Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 1997 Ohio 272, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1229.]

ASBURY APARTMENTS, JOINT VENTURE; RPS MANAGEMENT, APPELLEE, v. DAYTON BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 1997-Ohio-272.] Declaratory judgment—Appeal dismissed for failure to serve Attorney General pursuant to R.C. 2721.12. (No. 95-2495—Submitted November 18, 1996 at the Urbana Session—Decided January 15, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 15109. __________________ Gary L. Froelich, for appellee. J. Anthony Sawyer, Director of Law, and Steven R. Milby, Senior City Attorney, for appellants Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals and city of Dayton. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellee challenged the constitutionality of Dayton Revised Code of General Ordinances 150.128(E), but failed to serve the Attorney General pursuant to R.C. 2721.12. When a statute or municipal ordinance is challenged in a declaratory judgment action, the failure to serve the Attorney General is a jurisdictional defect that can be raised at any time; therefore, because the courts below lacked jurisdiction, we vacate the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeals, and we dismiss this appeal. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1229.]

ASBURY APARTMENTS, JOINT VENTURE; RPS MANAGEMENT, APPELLEE, v. DAYTON BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 1997-Ohio-272.] Declaratory judgment—Appeal dismissed for failure to serve Attorney General pursuant to R.C. 2721.12. (No. 95-2495—Submitted November 18, 1996 at the Urbana Session—Decided January 15, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 15109. __________________ Gary L. Froelich, for appellee. J. Anthony Sawyer, Director of Law, and Steven R. Milby, Senior City Attorney, for appellants Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals and city of Dayton. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellee challenged the constitutionality of Dayton Revised Code of General Ordinances 150.128(E), but failed to serve the Attorney General pursuant to R.C. 2721.12. When a statute or municipal ordinance is challenged in a declaratory judgment action, the failure to serve the Attorney General is a jurisdictional defect that can be raised at any time; therefore, because the courts below lacked jurisdiction, we vacate the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeals, and we dismiss this appeal. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1997 Ohio 272, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asbury-apts-v-dayton-bd-of-zoning-appeals-ohio-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack