Asbestos Trading & Finance Co. v. Ballard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Asbestos Trading & Finance Co. v. Ballard

190 N.C. 875

DecidedDecember 2, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 190 N.C. 875 (Asbestos Trading & Finance Co. v. Ballard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Asbestos Trading & Finance Co. v. Ballard, 190 N.C. 875 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe defendant denied that be executed tbe trade acceptance sued on. Plaintiff introduced evidence tending to show that tbe signature in tbe name of tbe defendant was in bis band-writing. Defendant denied that be signed it and offered evidence tending to show that it was not in bis bandwriting, and upon a proper charge as favorable to tbe plaintiff as it could obtain under tbe law, tbe jury has resolved this question of fact in favor of tbe defendant. There is no prejudicial error upon tbe record. Therefore, let it be-certified that there is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe defendant denied that be executed tbe trade acceptance sued on. Plaintiff introduced evidence tending to show that tbe signature in tbe name of tbe defendant was in bis band-writing. Defendant denied that be signed it and offered evidence tending to show that it was not in bis bandwriting, and upon a proper charge as favorable to tbe plaintiff as it could obtain under tbe law, tbe jury has resolved this question of fact in favor of tbe defendant. There is no prejudicial error upon tbe record. Therefore, let it be-certified that there is

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 N.C. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asbestos-trading-finance-co-v-ballard-nc-1925.