Asberry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Asberry v. State

656 So. 2d 531, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6008, 1995 WL 331518

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1406

StatusPublished

This text of 656 So. 2d 531 (Asberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Asberry v. State, 656 So. 2d 531, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6008, 1995 WL 331518 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence with the exception of the restitution order in the amount of $925.00 which, in accordance with the state’s concession of error, must be remanded to be corrected to conform to the oral pronouncement of $920.00. See Allred v. State, 642 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (discrepancy between written and oral pronouncement of restitution requires reversal).

WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MICKLE, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence with the exception of the restitution order in the amount of $925.00 which, in accordance with the state’s concession of error, must be remanded to be corrected to conform to the oral pronouncement of $920.00. See Allred v. State, 642 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (discrepancy between written and oral pronouncement of restitution requires reversal).

WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

656 So. 2d 531, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6008, 1995 WL 331518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asberry-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack