Asbell v. State

747 So. 2d 472, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17623, 1999 WL 1267283
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 1999
DocketNo. 99-207
StatusPublished

This text of 747 So. 2d 472 (Asbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Asbell v. State, 747 So. 2d 472, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17623, 1999 WL 1267283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and reverse for resentencing in conformity with Gamble v. State, 723 So.2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). See Benedit v. State, 610 So.2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). We note that the trial court did not have the benefit of Gamble when sentencing appellant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

ANTOON, C.J., DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gamble v. State
723 So. 2d 905 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Benedit v. State
610 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
747 So. 2d 472, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17623, 1999 WL 1267283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asbell-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.