Asbell v. State

747 So. 2d 472, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17623, 1999 WL 1267283
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1999·No. No. 99-207·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and reverse for resentencing in conformity with Gamble v. State, 723 So.2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). See Benedit v. State, 610 So.2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). We note that the trial court did not have the benefit of Gamble when sentencing appellant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

ANTOON, C.J., DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Asbell v. State, 747 So. 2d 472, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17623, 1999 WL 1267283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

747 So. 2d 472 (Asbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gamble v. State
723 So. 2d 905 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Benedit v. State
610 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)