Asare v. Lynch

670 F. App'x 841
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 23, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1479
StatusPublished

This text of 670 F. App'x 841 (Asare v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Asare v. Lynch, 670 F. App'x 841 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Asare, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Asare’s motion to reconsider its decision upholding the Immigration Judge’s denial of his motion for a continuance. We have reviewed the administrative record and Asare’s claims, and find them to be without merit. We accordingly find [842]*842no abuse of discretion in the denial of reconsideration, see Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009), and deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Asare (B.I.A. Mar. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in' the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Narine v. Holder
559 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 F. App'x 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asare-v-lynch-ca4-2016.