Asarco Inc. v. United States

111 F.3d 10, 1997 WL 200418
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 1997
DocketNo. 1340, Docket 96-6242
StatusPublished

This text of 111 F.3d 10 (Asarco Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Asarco Inc. v. United States, 111 F.3d 10, 1997 WL 200418 (2d Cir. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case concerns the pre-1976 minimum tax provisions contained in Sections 56 and 57 of the Internal Revenue Code. 26 U.S.C. §§ 56 & 57 (1975). We affirm the judgment of the district court (Mary Johnson Lowe, Judge), for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion and order, Asarco Inc. v. United States, No. 89 Civ. 7078(MJL), 1996 WL 417521 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 1996), and by the Court of Claims in its opinion in Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 334, 685 F.2d 1346 (1982), an opinion which the district court properly described as “squarely and thoroughly address[ing]” Asarco’s arguments. Asarco, 1996 WL 417521, at *1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. United States
685 F.2d 1346 (Court of Claims, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 F.3d 10, 1997 WL 200418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asarco-inc-v-united-states-ca2-1997.