Asam Manufacturing Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Asam Manufacturing Co. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 314

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 24, 1955

DocketNo. 58863; protests 179038-K, etc. (Detroit)

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 314 (Asam Manufacturing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Asam Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 314 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of speedometers and parts thereof similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of Industrial Operations, Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 82, C. D. 1500), except that the speedometers [315]*315and parts thereof in the cited case were designed and intended for use as parts of motorcycles whereas those at bar are intended for use as parts of automobiles, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of speedometers and parts thereof similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of Industrial Operations, Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 82, C. D. 1500), except that the speedometers [315]*315and parts thereof in the cited case were designed and intended for use as parts of motorcycles whereas those at bar are intended for use as parts of automobiles, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Cust. Ct. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asam-manufacturing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack