Asa W. Allen Co. v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad
58 So. 710, 102 Miss. 35
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action against the appellee for alleged injuries to a mule, occurring while being transported from St. Louis, Mo., to Tupelo, Miss. The circuit court instructed the jury to find for the defendant railroad company. It is practically conceded by appellant’s counsel ■that we must overrule a long line of decisions of this court in order to reverse.
We do not feel warranted in doing this, and the case ,is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Asa W. Allen Co. v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad, 58 So. 710, 102 Miss. 35 (Mich. 1912).
58 So. 710 (Asa W. Allen Co. v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Louisville N. R. Co. v. Strickland
122 So. 693 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Vaughn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
15 S.W.2d 901 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1929)
Ruebel Bros. v. American Express Co.
190 Iowa 600 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1920)