Asa Lake v. Hancock ex rel. Payne
This text of 29 Fla. 336 (Asa Lake v. Hancock ex rel. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The transcript was not filed till February 24th, 1892. As the appeal was entered on December 3d, 1891, the transcript should, properly, have been filed here on the first day of the present term, which was January 12th, 1892. The motion to dismiss not being made, however, until May 9th, 1892, which was after the filing of the transcript, it must be denied. Bingham vs. Morris, 6 Cranch, 99 ; Pickett vs. Legewood, 7 Peters, 144; Sparrow vs. Strong, 3 Wall., 97; Kimball Lumber Co. vs. Ruge, 26 Fla., 59,7 South. Rep., 373. The other grounds of the motion to dismiss, not being noticed in the brief, are abandoned. J., T. & K. W. Ry. Co. vs. P. L. T. & M. Co., 27 Fla., 1; 9 South. Rep., 661.
The motion is denied, and it will be so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Fla. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asa-lake-v-hancock-ex-rel-payne-fla-1892.