As v. State
Opinion
A.S., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow and Frank D.L. Winstead, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Michael J. Scionti, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.
We affirm A.S.'s adjudication of delinquency. We remand this case, however, for correction of the sentence. Although the trial court orally pronounced that A.S.'s sentences for Counts I and II would be served concurrently, the written commitment order provides that the sentences are to run consecutively. "When there is a difference between a court's oral pronouncement and a written *1039 order, the oral pronouncement controls." D.F. v. State, 650 So.2d 1097, 1098 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we remand for correction of the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement that the sentences are to run concurrently.
Remanded with instructions.
ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
714 So. 2d 1038 (As v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.