A.S. v. Point Quest

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedApril 15, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-02029
StatusUnknown

This text of A.S. v. Point Quest (A.S. v. Point Quest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.S. v. Point Quest, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 LAW OFFICES OF WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER 2 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 650 CALIFORNIA STREET, 26TH FLOOR 3 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108-2615 T: (415) 981-7210 · F: (415) 391-6965 4 KHALDOUN A. BAGHDADI (State Bar #190111) kbaghdadi@walkuplawoffice.com 5 VALERIE N. ROSE (State Bar #272566) vrose@walkuplawoffice.com 6 KATHERINE CONNOLLY (State Bar #343524) kconnolly@walkuplawoffice.com 7 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF A.S., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER 8 GUARDIAN AD LITEM SHAWN SPRINGER

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11

12 A.S., a minor, by and through her Case No. 2:23-cv-02029-TLN-CSK Guardian ad Litem SHAWN 13 SPRINGER, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 Plaintiff,

15 v. Hon. Troy L. Nunley Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim 16 POINT QUEST, VACAVILLE UNIFIED

SCHOOL DISTRICT, ANASTASIA

17 BOOMER, HANNAH SMITH and

DOES 1-30, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19

20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production 22 of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from 23 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation 24 may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court 25 to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 26 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery 27 and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 1 applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 2 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 3 confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rules 141 and 141.1 set forth the 4 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 5 party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 6 2. DEFINITIONS 7 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 8 designation of information or items under this Order. 9 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 10 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 11 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and includes, but is not 12 limited to, parties’ personnel records and other records referencing employment or 13 job performance, parties’ student records, and parties’ medical records. 14 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House 15 Counsel (as well as their support staff). 16 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 17 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 18 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 20 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 21 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 22 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 23 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 24 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 25 an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 26 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. 27 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 1 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 2 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 3 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 4 to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have 5 appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 6 has appeared on behalf of that party. 7 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 8 employees, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 9 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 10 Discovery Material in this action. 11 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 12 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 13 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 14 and their employees and subcontractors. 15 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 16 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 17 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 18 from a Producing Party. 19 3. SCOPE 20 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 21 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 22 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 23 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 24 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 25 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the 26 following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of 27 disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its 1 this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; 2 and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or 3 obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the 4 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 5 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate 6 agreement or order. 7 4. DURATION 8 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 9 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 10 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be 11 deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with 12 or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and 13 exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 14 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time 15 pursuant to applicable law. 16 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 17 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 18 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under 19 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 20 qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for 21 protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 22 communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 23 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 24 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 25 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 26 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 27 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to 1 Party to sanctions. 2 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it 3 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 4 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 5 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
A.S. v. Point Quest, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/as-v-point-quest-caed-2024.