Arzt v. Arzt

193 A.D.2d 572, 598 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4526
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered July 25, 1990, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s verdict that the defendants were not negligent should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence since a fair interpretation of the record could lead to the conclusion that the defendants were not negligent (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

The plaintiff’s other contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arzt v. Arzt, 193 A.D.2d 572, 598 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 572 (Arzt v. Arzt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dingle v. Virga
195 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)