Arzt v. Arzt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arzt v. Arzt

193 A.D.2d 572, 598 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 572 (Arzt v. Arzt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arzt v. Arzt, 193 A.D.2d 572, 598 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered July 25, 1990, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s verdict that the defendants were not negligent should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence since a fair interpretation of the record could lead to the conclusion that the defendants were not negligent (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

The plaintiff’s other contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered July 25, 1990, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s verdict that the defendants were not negligent should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence since a fair interpretation of the record could lead to the conclusion that the defendants were not negligent (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

The plaintiff’s other contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 572, 598 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arzt-v-arzt-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack