Arzoumanian v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

967 So. 2d 1020, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18402, 2007 WL 3201333
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 2007
DocketNo. 4D06-4561
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 967 So. 2d 1020 (Arzoumanian v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arzoumanian v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n, 967 So. 2d 1020, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18402, 2007 WL 3201333 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order on Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for appellants, who has been recently retained, has filed a motion to relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court in order for appellants to file a motion for relief from judgment under rule 1.540. Because relinquishment of jurisdiction for consideration of a rule 1.540 motion results in delay, we do not routinely grant motions to relinquish for this purpose unless we have been furnished a copy of the rule 1.540 motion. We accordingly deny this motion without prejudice to appellants filing their rule 1.540 motion in the trial court, and then filing a motion for relinquishment in this court, with a copy of the rule 1.540 motion attached.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNulty v. BankUnited
140 So. 3d 1041 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
967 So. 2d 1020, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18402, 2007 WL 3201333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arzoumanian-v-us-bank-national-assn-fladistctapp-2007.