Arzola v. Reigosa
This text of 534 So. 2d 883 (Arzola v. Reigosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leonardo ARZOLA, Petitioner,
v.
Lucia REIGOSA and Elena Barrios Reigosa, Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Neil Carver, Coral Gables, for petitioner.
Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl and Kathleen M. Salyer, Miami, for respondents.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a trial court order which directs the pretrial discovery of medical records concerning the plaintiff's post-accident psychiatric treatment is denied. The plaintiff brought the instant negligence action arising out of an automobile/bicycle collision below and, inter alia, sought mental anguish damages. This being so, he cannot claim, as urged, a psychotherapistpatient privilege with respect to these records; there is no such privilege "[f]or communications relevant to an issue of the mental or emotional condition of the patient in any proceeding in which he relies upon the condition as an element of his claim... ." § 90.503(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1987). Contrary to plaintiff's argument, we conclude that plaintiff has made his post-accident mental or emotional condition an element of his negligence claim below by requesting post-accident mental anguish damages; we reach this result based on the indistinguishable authority of Yoho v. Lindsley, 248 So.2d 187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971), and Haney v. Mizell Memorial Hospital, 744 F.2d 1467 (11th Cir.1984) (applying Florida law).
CERTIORARI DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
534 So. 2d 883, 1988 WL 129157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arzola-v-reigosa-fladistctapp-1988.