Arzillo v. Parry

49 A.D.2d 876, 373 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11081
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 6, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 876 (Arzillo v. Parry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arzillo v. Parry, 49 A.D.2d 876, 373 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to review two determinations of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, each dated October 24, 1974, which, after statutory fair hearings, affirmed separate orders of the Commissioner of the Orange County Department of Social Services which directed reductions in certain grants of public assistance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered April 29,1975, which, inter alia, (1) adjudged this a proper class action, (2) annulled the determinations under review and (3) remanded the matter to the State Commissioner for further proceedings. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the first decretal paragraph and substituting therefor a provision to the effect that this proceeding may not be maintained as a class action. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. The determinations were rendered in the absence of findings of willfulness and undue hardship, contrary to the applicable paragraphs of 18 NYCRR 352.31(d). Although we hold that this is not a proper case for a class action (see Matter of Scarpelli v Lavine, 48 AD2d 899; Matter of Mann v Lavine, 49 AD2d 879), we nevertheless affirm the remand for further proceedings. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Margett, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catoe v. Lavine
51 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.2d 876, 373 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arzillo-v-parry-nyappdiv-1975.