Arwood v. State

103 S.E. 726, 25 Ga. App. 482, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 22
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 14, 1920·No. 11556·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence, while weak, authorized the defendant’s conviction of the offense of vagrancy, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. William E. Mann, W. Gordon Mann, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 17 Ga. App. 742; 119 Ga. 427, and cit.

Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arwood v. State, 103 S.E. 726, 25 Ga. App. 482, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 22 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 726 (Arwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunnicutt v. State
31 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)