Arwood v. State

103 S.E. 726, 25 Ga. App. 482, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 22
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 14, 1920
Docket11556
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 726 (Arwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arwood v. State, 103 S.E. 726, 25 Ga. App. 482, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 22 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence, while weak, authorized the defendant’s conviction of the offense of vagrancy, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. William E. Mann, W. Gordon Mann, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 17 Ga. App. 742; 119 Ga. 427, and cit.

Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunnicutt v. State
31 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 726, 25 Ga. App. 482, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arwood-v-state-gactapp-1920.