Arvizu v. Heights Roofing
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 3, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________
No. 3D13-1339 Lower Tribunal No. 11-5508 ________________
Teresa Arvizu, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Olegario Rincon, etc., Appellant,
vs.
Heights Roofing, Inc., Israel J. Garcia, and Hector Cabrera, Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marc Schumacher, Judge.
Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A., and Raquel Y. Reyes-Lao and Ronald D. Rodman, for appellant.
Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole and Daniel M. Schwarz, for appellees.
Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER, and LOGUE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Although this case reflects a tragic workplace accident that cost Olegario
Rincon his life, there was insufficient evidence that his supervisors acted with
culpable negligence within the meaning of section 440.11(1)(b), Florida Statutes
(2009), as is required to remove this case from the ambit of the laws of Worker’s
Compensation. See Fla. Dep’t of Transp. v. Juliano, 864 So. 2d 11, 16 (Fla. 3d
DCA 2003) (holding there was no evidence of culpable negligence where
supervisors were merely aware of poor condition and could have done more to
remedy it); Mekamy Oaks, Inc. v. Snyder, 659 So. 2d 1290, 1291 (Fla. 5th DCA
1995) (holding supervisor’s removal of safety switch did not amount to crime of
culpable negligence). Summary judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arvizu v. Heights Roofing (Arvizu v. Heights Roofing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.