Arvizu v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided June 27, 2022·No. 4:21-cv-00028·Unknown

Opinion

Rafael Armando Arvizu, ) No. CV 21-28-TUC-JAS (LCK) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) vs. ) ) ) Acting Commissioner of the Social) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is accepted and adopted. (2) This case is remanded for further proceedings as discussed in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29). ] (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. Dated this 27th day of June, 2022. Aico ° Honorable James A. Soto United States District Judge -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arvizu v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, (D. Ariz. 2022).

Arvizu v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Arvizu v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ambraziunas v. Hatch
23 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (D. Colorado, 1998)
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp.
170 F.3d 734 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)