Arvin, Nicholas v. Andrew Duenas d/b/a Camacho’s Famous

2025 TN WC 40
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJune 25, 2025
Docket2023-60-4432
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 TN WC 40 (Arvin, Nicholas v. Andrew Duenas d/b/a Camacho’s Famous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arvin, Nicholas v. Andrew Duenas d/b/a Camacho’s Famous, 2025 TN WC 40 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

FILED Jun 25, 2025 07:22 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE

Nicholas Arvin, ) Docket No. 2023-60-4432 Employee, ) v. ) Andrew Duenas ) State File No. 860273-2023 d/b/a Camacho’s Famous, ) Employer. ) ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS (Decision on the Record)

This Court considered Mr. Arvin’s request for an expedited hearing based on the record under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-.15(1)(e) (2023) on June 23, 2025. Mr. Arvin sought payment of medical bills for injuries from severe burns he suffered while working at Camacho’s Famous. Mr. Arvin also requested a finding that he is eligible to apply for payment from the Uninsured Employers Fund (UEF). The Court holds that he would likely prevail at a final hearing in proving entitlement to medical benefits. Mr. Arvin is also eligible to apply for payment from the UEF. Claim History

On June 16, 2023, Mr. Arvin suffered severe burns from a bucket of scalding water while working for Camacho’s. He explained that when he began draining boiling water from one of the fryers at work into a bucket, the water pressure caused the bucket to fall over, burning his right leg.

Mr. Arvin’s mother, Kimberly Long, drove him to the emergency room, where he was diagnosed with second-degree burns to his right leg. Providers treated Mr. Arvin’s burns, released him, and recommended he return as needed.

Mr. Duenas did not dispute that he did not have an active workers’ compensation policy at the time of Mr. Arvin’s injury and that Mr. Arvin was his employee. Mr. Duenas

1 also did not object to the medical bills and accepted responsibility for payment totaling $8,965.53.

Mr. Arvin filed his petition on June 21, 2023, alleging his injury and that Mr. Duenas did not have workers’ compensation coverage on the date of injury. Afterward, a Bureau compliance specialist investigated and concluded that “coverage was not verified in the [National Council on Compensation Insurance] database for the date of injury.”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Arvin seeks payment of medical bills. He must provide sufficient evidence showing he would likely prevail at a final hearing. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Mr. Duenas must pay Mr. Arvin’s medical bills from his work injury. Under the Workers’ Compensation Law, the employer “shall furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment . . . made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” § 50- 6-204(a)(1)(A). An “injury” means “an injury by accident . . . arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment that causes . . . the need for medical treatment.” § 50-6-102(14).

Here, Mr. Arvin’s medical records show that he suffered severe burns from scalding water while working for Camacho’s Famous and that he incurred $8,965.53 in medical bills for treatment of those burns.

The Court finds the treatment he received for his injury was reasonable and medically necessary. Mr. Duenas did not pay for the treatment and admitted that he lacked insurance to cover the costs. The Bureau’s investigation confirmed that he was uninsured on the date of injury.

Therefore, the Court holds that Mr. Duenas must pay all the medical bills for Mr. Arvin’s treatment, subject to the workers’ compensation fee schedule. See, e.g., Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 62, at *10 (Oct. 17, 2017) (“[A]n employer who does not timely provide a panel of physicians risks being required to pay for treatment an injured worker receives on his own.”).

Having found that Mr. Arvin is likely to prove he is entitled to benefits, the Court next examines his eligibility for assistance from the UEF. The Bureau has discretion to pay limited medical benefits from the UEF to an employee injured while working for an uninsured employer, provided the employee meets certain criteria:

1) He worked for an employer who failed to carry workers’ compensation

2 insurance; 2) He suffered an injury arising primarily in the course and scope of employment on or after July 1, 2015; 3) He was a Tennessee resident on the date he was injured; 4) He provided notice to the Bureau of the injury and of the failure of the employer to secure payment of compensation within a reasonable period, but no longer than 60 days after the date of injury.

§ 50-6-801(d)(4).

Mr. Arvin offered proof of all four requirements: He worked for an uninsured employer, was injured after July 1, 2015, resided in Tennessee on the date of injury, and filed a petition for benefit determination within 60 days after the date of injury. He was injured on June 16, 2023, and filed a petition for benefit determination on June 21, 2023. Therefore, he qualifies to apply for payment from the UEF.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Andrew Duenas doing business as Camacho’s Famous shall pay the providers $8,965.53 in medical expenses Mr. Arvin incurred from his accident, subject to the fee schedule.

2. Mr. Arvin is eligible to apply for discretionary payments from the UEF.

3. The Court sets a status hearing on September 8 at 10:15 a.m. Central Time. You must dial 615-532-9552 or 866-943-0025 to participate.

4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the expedited hearing order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). Mr. Duenas must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’ Compensation Penalty Unit by email at WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED June 26, 2025.

_______________________________________ Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims 3 APPENDIX

1. Petition for Benefit Determination, photos, Request for Investigation 2. Request to Resume Mediation, Dispute Resolution Statement 3. Dispute Certification Notice 4. Hearing Request, Tennova Bill, emergency physician bill 5. Court Communication requesting a declaration/affidavit 6. Order Setting Status Hearing 7. Declaration of Kimberly Long 8. Status Order 9. Medical Records, Tennova Healthcare 10. Declaration of Nick Arvin

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on June 26, 2025.

Name Certified Regular Email Sent to Mail mail Nicholas Arvin, X X 487 Kinslow Ct. employee Clarksville, TN 37040 klong4125@yahoo.com Camacho’s Famous, X X 1021 TN-76 Ste. 106 employer Clarksville, TN 37040 Camachosfamous@gmail.com Uninsured X Lashawn.pender@tn.gov Employers Fund

____________________________________________ Penny Shrum, Court Clerk Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims Wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

4 Right to Appeal: If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must: 1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 TN WC 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arvin-nicholas-v-andrew-duenas-dba-camachos-famous-tennworkcompcl-2025.