Arvelo v. Richards Department Stores
Opinion
The appellants are the plaintiffs in an action against the defendant for alleged malicious defamation and unlawful detention of the appellant, Alberto Arvelo. Upon defendant’s failure to plead, a default was entered, and upon an ex parte trial, a substantial judgment was entered for both compensatory and punitive damages. Three days after trial and prior to entry of final judgment, the appellee filed its motion to set aside default alleging that it had a men-[547] torious defense. The motion was granted and the judgment was set aside. This appeal followed.
Based upon the principles and the authority cited in Imperial Industries, Inc. v. Moore Pipe and Sprinkler Co., Fla.App.1972, 261 So.2d 540, we affirm the order of the trial court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
304 So. 2d 546 (Arvelo v. Richards Department Stores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.