Arvay v. New York Telephone Co.

81 A.D.2d 600, 437 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11084
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 13, 1981·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to compel the defendant to remove certain of its equipment from real property owned by plaintiffs, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 19, 1979, as granted its motion for a preliminary injunction on terms other than those set forth in its proposed order. On the court’s own motion, preliminary injunction dated November 19, 1979 vacated and appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. In the absence [601]*601of the counterclaim by defendant which would provide the jurisdictional predicate for the granted relief (CPLR 6001, 6301), Special Term was without power to grant a preliminary injunction to defendant (see Pen Kem, Inc. v Goetz, 75 AD 2d 579). Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arvay v. New York Telephone Co., 81 A.D.2d 600, 437 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

81 A.D.2d 600 (Arvay v. New York Telephone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Area Plumbing Supply, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 3798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
BSI, LLC v. Toscano
70 A.D.3d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Binns v. Billhimer
271 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Seebaugh v. Borruso
220 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)