Arutt v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arutt v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

74 A.D.2d 885, 425 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 885 (Arutt v. State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arutt v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, 74 A.D.2d 885, 425 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Three proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review three orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, all dated August 8, 1979, each of which (1) annulled an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 31, 1979, which, inter alia, found that discriminatory acts had been committed and (2) dismissed the complaint, on the ground that it was not processed within the statutorily prescribed period. Cross applications have been made to have determinations made on the merits. Petitions and cross applications granted to the extent that the orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board are annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matters are remitted to the appeals board for determinations on the merits of the issues raised on the appeals to it (see Matter of Sarkisian Bros, v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Three proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review three orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, all dated August 8, 1979, each of which (1) annulled an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 31, 1979, which, inter alia, found that discriminatory acts had been committed and (2) dismissed the complaint, on the ground that it was not processed within the statutorily prescribed period. Cross applications have been made to have determinations made on the merits. Petitions and cross applications granted to the extent that the orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board are annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matters are remitted to the appeals board for determinations on the merits of the issues raised on the appeals to it (see Matter of Sarkisian Bros, v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 885, 425 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arutt-v-state-human-rights-appeal-board-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack