Arundel Corp. v. State
267 A.D. 1045, 49 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6165
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 1944·No. Claim No. 25463·Published
Opinion
— Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Dowling, J., .not voting. (The judgment is for claimant on a claim against the State for extra work done under a contract for the dredging of a section of the Barge Canal.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ. [See 268 App. Div. 821.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arundel Corp. v. State, 267 A.D. 1045, 49 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
267 A.D. 1045 (Arundel Corp. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.