Arundel Corp. v. State
This text of 267 A.D. 1045 (Arundel Corp. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Dowling, J., .not voting. (The judgment is for claimant on a claim against the State for extra work done under a contract for the dredging of a section of the Barge Canal.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ. [See 268 App. Div. 821.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arundel-corp-v-state-nyappdiv-1944.