Aruck v. Xerox Corp.
166 A.D.2d 907, 561 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12180
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs (see, Pietsch v Moog, Inc., 156 AD2d 1019). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ. [See, 144 Misc 2d 367.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aruck v. Xerox Corp., 166 A.D.2d 907, 561 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
166 A.D.2d 907 (Aruck v. Xerox Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manning v. Town of Lewiston
191 A.D.2d 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Brown v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
188 A.D.2d 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.
180 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)