Arturo Solis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
This text of Arturo Solis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (Arturo Solis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10-00222-CV
ARTURO SOLIS, Appellant v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND DISTRICT CLERK OF 52ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Appellees
From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. COT-09-39041
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Arturo Solis, an inmate, attempts to appeal an order of costs from the trial court
signed on March 22, 2010. Solis filed a lawsuit against the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice and an affidavit of inability to pay costs pursuant to Chapter 14 of the
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. Ch 14
(Vernon 2002). The trial court found Solis not to be a pauper and ordered costs in
accordance with section 14.006(b) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Id. §
14.006(b). Solis’s underlying lawsuit remains pending. By letter dated July 5, 2010, the Clerk of this Court notified Solis that his appeal
was subject to dismissal because it appeared there is no right to appeal the order Solis
was attempting to appeal. Solis was warned that the Court would dismiss the appeal
unless a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Solis filed a
response but it fails to show grounds for continuing the appeal. As part of the response,
Solis requests that we convert his appeal to a petition for writ of mandamus. Doing so
would not help Solis.
The complained of order is interlocutory and can neither be appealed at this
time, nor can it be reviewed by mandamus. See In re Hearn, 137 S.W.3d 681, 684 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding); see also McCray v. Allee, No. 10-06-00243-
CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 9215 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, pet. dism’d). Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3; 44.3.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed September 8, 2010 [CV06]
Solis v. TDCJ Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arturo Solis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arturo-solis-v-texas-department-of-criminal-justic-texapp-2010.