Arturo Samuel Trevino & Lexington National Insurance Co. D/B/A El Padrino Bail Bonds v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 23, 2011
• Docket: 13-10-00637-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00637-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ARTURO SAMUEL TREVINO & LEXINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. D/B/A EL PADRINO BAIL BONDS, Appellants,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Arturo Samuel Trevino & Lexington National Insurance Co. d/b/a El

Padrino Bail Bonds, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th District

Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2010-01-27-G. Because this case is a criminal matter, the Clerk of the Court has assigned it a “CR” designation. However,

this appeal is governed by the same procedural rules which govern civil appeals. TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.44 (Vernon 1979).

The parties to this appeal have filed a “Joint Motion to Dispose of Appeal” under

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(A). The parties request that this Court

vacate the trial court’s judgment without regards to the merits and render judgment in

accordance with the agreement of the parties.

The Court has considered the motion and it is the Court’s opinion that the motion

should be granted in part and denied in part.1 Accordingly, without regard to the merits,

we vacate the judgment as to appellants and remand the case to the trial court for

rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 43.2(d).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 23rd day of June, 2011.

1 Rule 42.1(a)(2) permits the Court to render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreements or to vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement; we cannot do both. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B).