Arturo Landa-Romero v. Eric Holder, Jr.

429 F. App'x 655
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 27, 2011
Docket09-71884
StatusUnpublished

This text of 429 F. App'x 655 (Arturo Landa-Romero v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arturo Landa-Romero v. Eric Holder, Jr., 429 F. App'x 655 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Arturo Landa-Romero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reissue its previous decision dismissing his appeal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Hernandez-Velasquez v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir.2010). We grant the petition for review.

The BIA abused its discretion in denying Landa-Romero’s motion to reissue where it failed to address Landa-Romero’s evidence that he did not receive the BIA’s August 21, 2008, order dismissing his appeal. See id. (BIA must consider the “weight and consequences” of petitioner’s evidence of non-receipt).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HERNANDEZ-VELASQUEZ v. Holder
611 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 F. App'x 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arturo-landa-romero-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.