Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)·Decided March 31, 2026·No. 01-26-00005-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued March 31, 2026

In The Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00005-CV ——————————— ARTURO GOMEZ, Appellant V. ROSA CASAREZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 308th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2025-17524

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Arturo Gomez filed its notice of appeal on January 2, 2026.

Appellant did not pay the appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes of

appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207,

51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District

Litigation, and in the Business Court, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July 26,

2024), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in courts of appeals).

The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that unless he paid the appellate filing fee

by February 23, 2026, his appeal could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

To date, Appellant has not responded to the Clerk’s notice, paid the appellate filing

fee, or established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.

We thus dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b)–(c), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez (Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.