Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez
This text of Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez (Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 31, 2026
In The Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00005-CV ——————————— ARTURO GOMEZ, Appellant V. ROSA CASAREZ, Appellee
On Appeal from the 308th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2025-17524
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Arturo Gomez filed its notice of appeal on January 2, 2026.
Appellant did not pay the appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes of
appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207,
51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District
Litigation, and in the Business Court, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July 26,
2024), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in courts of appeals).
The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that unless he paid the appellate filing fee
by February 23, 2026, his appeal could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).
To date, Appellant has not responded to the Clerk’s notice, paid the appellate filing
fee, or established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.
We thus dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(b)–(c), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arturo Gomez v. Rosa Casarez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arturo-gomez-v-rosa-casarez-txctapp1-2026.