ARTURO CANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ARTURO CANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ARTURO CANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
ARTURO CANO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2014 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed March 16, 2018.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Hunter W. Carroll, Judge.
Arturo Cano, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laurie Benoit-Knox, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ARTURO CANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arturo-cano-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.