Artope v. Barker

74 Ga. 462, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 336
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 24, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 74 Ga. 462 (Artope v. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Artope v. Barker, 74 Ga. 462, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 336 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Blandeord, Justice.

This was a motion to set aside a judgment rendered against J. B. Artope, as trustee for movants, he not being a party to this motion. The defendant in error, demurred. [465]*465to the motion, which the court sustained, and movants excepted. The motion alleged many facts which, if true, would have defeated the judgment. The motion to set aside a judgment, like a motion in arrest, must be grounded on defects apparent on the face of the record, and these defects must be such as are not amendable. Code, §3587. And it differs from a motion in arrest only in this, that the latter must be made during the term, while the former can be made at any time within the period of the statute of limitations Code, §3588. There are no defects in the record of the case but what were amendable; consequently they are cured by the judgment. It would have been better for defendant in error to have set out the trust, its terms and character, and the declaration would have been subject to demurrer for a failure in this respect; yet it would have been amendable, and after judgment this defect is cured, and a motion to set aside the judgment for amendable defects cannot be sustained. If the plaintiffs in error have any such rights as they maintain, they can be heard fully in a court of equity, where the rights of all the parties can be heard and determined; to that court we must refer the plaintiffs in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rahal v. Titus
138 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Norris v. South Side Atlanta Bank
92 S.E.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Jordan v. Charles S. Martin Distributing Co.
82 S.E.2d 263 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Conway v. Gower
66 S.E.2d 740 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Plunkett Warden v. Neal
41 S.E.2d 157 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Jackson v. Jackson
35 S.E.2d 258 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Fields v. Arnall
34 S.E.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
East Side Lumber & Coal Co. v. Barfield
18 S.E.2d 492 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Byers v. Byers
154 S.E. 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Schofield's Sons Co. v. Vaughn
150 S.E. 569 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Grogan v. Deraney
143 S.E. 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Zeigler v. Perry
141 S.E. 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Love v. National Liberty Insurance
121 S.E. 648 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Chance v. State
108 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Maddox Coffee Co. v. McHan
95 S.E. 736 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Drought v. Poage
59 S.E. 728 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Davis v. Bray
46 S.E. 90 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Regopoulas v. State
42 S.E. 1014 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Wegman Piano Co. v. Irvine
32 S.E. 898 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Jones v. Hammack
9 S.E. 537 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ga. 462, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artope-v-barker-ga-1885.