Artistic Shoe Co. v. Winkelman
232 A.D. 844
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 232 A.D. 844 (Artistic Shoe Co. v. Winkelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Artistic Shoe Co. v. Winkelman, 232 A.D. 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Order, and order as resettled, denying motion to direct plaintiff to serve an amended complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur; Seudder, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artistic-shoe-co-v-winkelman-nyappdiv-1931.