Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. Beiser

Ohio Supreme Court

Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. Beiser

942 N.E.2d 383, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1410

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 2, 2011

Docket2011-0052

StatusPublished

This text of 942 N.E.2d 383 (Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. Beiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. Beiser, 942 N.E.2d 383, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2010-02-039, 2010-Ohio-5427. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed December 14, 2010:

“When there is a factual dispute between the parties over the existence of a valid settlement agreement, is the trial court required to conduct an evidentiary hearing regardless of whether it enforces or denies enforcement of the agreement and enters judgment pursuant to the Ohio Supreme Court decision in Rulli v. Fan Co., 79 Ohio St.3d 374?”

The conflict cases are Michelle M.S. v. Eduardo H.T., Erie App. No. E-05-053, 2006-Ohio-2119, and Moore v. Johnson (Dec. 11,1997), Franklin App. No. 96APE11-1579.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler App. No. CA2010-02-039, 2010-Ohio-5427. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed December 14, 2010:

“When there is a factual dispute between the parties over the existence of a valid settlement agreement, is the trial court required to conduct an evidentiary hearing regardless of whether it enforces or denies enforcement of the agreement and enters judgment pursuant to the Ohio Supreme Court decision in Rulli v. Fan Co., 79 Ohio St.3d 374?”

The conflict cases are Michelle M.S. v. Eduardo H.T., Erie App. No. E-05-053, 2006-Ohio-2119, and Moore v. Johnson (Dec. 11,1997), Franklin App. No. 96APE11-1579.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

942 N.E.2d 383, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artisan-mechanical-inc-v-beiser-ohio-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack