Artis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Artis v. State

401 S.W.3d 580, 2013 WL 3146884, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 733

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 2013·No. No. ED 98874·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Artis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Artis’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Artis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Artis’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Artis v. State, 401 S.W.3d 580, 2013 WL 3146884, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

401 S.W.3d 580 (Artis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.