Artis v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.

322 F. App'x 306
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2009
DocketNo. 08-2354
StatusPublished

This text of 322 F. App'x 306 (Artis v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Artis v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Co., 322 F. App'x 306 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Andre Artis appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to grant Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his claims asserting unlawful discharge and retaliatory refusal to rehire, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), the Labor and Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (2006), and Virginia law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ar-tis’s motion for production of transcript at government expense and affirm the district court’s order. See Artis v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry dock Co., No. 4:07-cv-00054-RBS-JEB (E.D.Va. Nov. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 F. App'x 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artis-v-newport-news-shipbuilding-drydock-co-ca4-2009.