Artis v. Commissioner

1961 T.C. Memo. 92, 20 T.C.M. 415, 1961 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 247
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMarch 31, 1961
DocketDocket No. 50188.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1961 T.C. Memo. 92 (Artis v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Artis v. Commissioner, 1961 T.C. Memo. 92, 20 T.C.M. 415, 1961 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 247 (tax 1961).

Opinion

Earl Artis and Oda Bell Artis v. Commissioner.
Artis v. Commissioner
Docket No. 50188.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1961-92; 1961 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 247; 20 T.C.M. (CCH) 415; T.C.M. (RIA) 61092;
March 31, 1961

*247 Held, the joint returns filed by petitioners for the years 1948, 1949, and 1950 were false and fraudulent and part of the deficiency in petitioners' income tax for each of the years 1948, 1949, and 1950 is due to fraud with intent to evade tax.

Stanley E. Jennings, Esq., for the respondent.

BLACK

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

This proceeding involves deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax under sections 293(b) and 294(d)(2), Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 1 as follows:

Additions to Tax
YearAmountSec. 293(b)Sec. 294(d)(2)
1948$34,393.90$17,196.95$3,261.30
194943,690.2821,845.143,335.24
195018,673.369,336.681,867.54

*248 The petitioners defaulted in their appearances and on motion of respondent for judgment for failure to prosecute the petition, the Court granted the motion with respect to the deficiencies in income tax and the additions thereto under section 294(d)(2), as set out above and in the statutory notice. As to the additions to tax under section 293(b), respondent recognized that the burden of proof is on him. In recognition of this fact, respondent introduced considerable evidence, oral and documentary, in support of his determination of additions to tax under section 293(b). Petitioners introduced no evidence.

Findings of Fact

Petitioners Earl Artis and Oda Bell Artis are husband and wife and reside in Xenia, Ohio. Their joint returns for the years 1948, 1949, and 1950 were filed with the now district director of internal revenue for the Cincinnati, Ohio, district. Earl Artis will hereinafter be referred to as petitioner.

During the years herein involved petitioner was engaged in the illegal "numbers game" gambling business. During January and February 1948 he operated as a sole proprietor and for the balance of 1948 he joined with Leland Rice in a partnership to carry on the gambling*249 enterprise in which petitioner was to receive two-thirds of the proceeds and Rice one-third of the proceeds. In 1949 and 1950, petitioner and Rice continued the illegal gambling business as a partnership, each to share equally in the proceeds.

The numbers game is operated by a "house" which receives bets placed with "writers" and delivered to the house through "pickup men" and "runners." Bets are placed with the writers at numerous locations on a number, usually based on the reported daily transactions of the New York Stock Exchange. Odds given the players run 500 to 600 to 1. Thus, a 5 cent bet might return a player $25. Such a win is termed a "hit." Each writer deducts a commission, usually 25 percent from the bets received by him and turns the proceeds over to a pickup man. The pickup man in turn delivers the bets to the house, less a commission, usually around 10 percent. Thus, of each dollar bet the house will receive about 65 cents. This figure is termed the "net low." In order to protect themselves against heavy hits on particular numbers, the house will sometimes place a bet against such a contingency with another numbers house or individual. This is termed "overlay" or "layoff. *250 " The house operators are responsible for paying out the hits through the pickup men or runners to the writers and thence to the winning players.

The primary records of the Artis-Rice gambling activity were destroyed after 2 or 3 days, since they were afraid such records would fall into the hands of the local law enforcement officers and be used against them. Most of the runners and pickup men also did not retain records. The operators did keep daily report sheets prepared from the primary records. These sheets had a column for the symbols identifying various runners and pickup men and others with whom the gamblers did business. Another column recorded the "net low" money received from wagers and a third column recorded the hits paid out. Amounts for travel and other expenses paid to runners and pickup men were also shown on the daily report.

An internal revenue agent working with a special agent made an investigation of the tax liabilities of petitioners commencing in June 1951 and extending until May 1953.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. United States
348 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1955)
Earl Artis v. United States
238 F.2d 237 (Sixth Circuit, 1956)
Howell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
175 F.2d 240 (Sixth Circuit, 1949)
Rogers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
111 F.2d 987 (Sixth Circuit, 1940)
Howell v. Commissioner
10 T.C. 859 (U.S. Tax Court, 1948)
Safra v. Commissioner
30 T.C. 1026 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)
Schwarzkopf v. Commissioner
1956 T.C. Memo. 155 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)
Richards v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
111 F.2d 378 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1961 T.C. Memo. 92, 20 T.C.M. 415, 1961 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artis-v-commissioner-tax-1961.