Artis Jackson v. United States

Third Circuit

Artis Jackson v. United States

455 F.2d 991

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 22, 1972·No. 71-1220·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

There is before us on this appeal the fifth attempt by the appellant Jackson to gain a new trial or his liberty by ha-beas corpus or by 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In deciding his present application, Chief Judge Augelli filed three memorandum opinions. The first opinion was filed January 7, 1971, the second February 24, 1971, and the third February 26, 1971, 338 F.Supp. 7. Every phase of the present application has been adequately considered, thoroughly discussed and correctly decided by Chief Judge Augelli in his three excellent opinions. Nothing need be added by us.

The order denying Jackson’s motion to vacate the judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

There is before us on this appeal the fifth attempt by the appellant Jackson to gain a new trial or his liberty by ha-beas corpus or by 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In deciding his present application, Chief Judge Augelli filed three memorandum opinions. The first opinion was filed January 7, 1971, the second February 24, 1971, and the third February 26, 1971, 338 F.Supp. 7. Every phase of the present application has been adequately considered, thoroughly discussed and correctly decided by Chief Judge Augelli in his three excellent opinions. Nothing need be added by us.

The order denying Jackson’s motion to vacate the judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

Artis Jackson v. United States, 455 F.2d 991 (3d Cir. 1972).

Pincite

455 F.2d 991 (Artis Jackson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related