Artis Jackson v. James A. Hart, F.B.I., Gabriel Bergamo, Margaret Link, Dolores Mooney, Robert A. Baine, Harold Lester Howard, and Vincent Loffa

Third Circuit

Artis Jackson v. James A. Hart, F.B.I., Gabriel Bergamo, Margaret Link, Dolores Mooney, Robert A. Baine, Harold Lester Howard, and Vincent Loffa

435 F.2d 1293, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1005, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5775

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 28, 1970

Docket19093_1

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 435 F.2d 1293 (Artis Jackson v. James A. Hart, F.B.I., Gabriel Bergamo, Margaret Link, Dolores Mooney, Robert A. Baine, Harold Lester Howard, and Vincent Loffa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Artis Jackson v. James A. Hart, F.B.I., Gabriel Bergamo, Margaret Link, Dolores Mooney, Robert A. Baine, Harold Lester Howard, and Vincent Loffa, 435 F.2d 1293, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1005, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5775 (3d Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant brought a complaint in the district court based on the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, naming seven separate defendants. Thereafter, three of these defendants — Bergamo, Link, and Mooney — filed a motion which was treated by the court as a motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ. Pro. 56. Plaintiff has appealed from a granting of this motion for summary judgment in favor of three of the seven defendants.

The district court did not make a certification under Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 54(b). This court has consistently held that in the absence of the district court’s “express determination that there is no just reason for delay” and “an express direction for the entry of judgment” where multiple parties are involved as provided in Rule 54(b), judgments relating to the claims or liabilities of less than all the parties ai’e not deemed final, and therefore are not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. E. g., Rinker v. Local Union No. 24 of Amalgamated Lithographers, 313 F.2d 956 (3 Cir. 1963). See United Bonding Ins. Co. v. Stein, 410 F.2d 483, 486 (3 Cir. 1969).

The appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant brought a complaint in the district court based on the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, naming seven separate defendants. Thereafter, three of these defendants — Bergamo, Link, and Mooney — filed a motion which was treated by the court as a motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ. Pro. 56. Plaintiff has appealed from a granting of this motion for summary judgment in favor of three of the seven defendants.

The district court did not make a certification under Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 54(b). This court has consistently held that in the absence of the district court’s “express determination that there is no just reason for delay” and “an express direction for the entry of judgment” where multiple parties are involved as provided in Rule 54(b), judgments relating to the claims or liabilities of less than all the parties ai’e not deemed final, and therefore are not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. E. g., Rinker v. Local Union No. 24 of Amalgamated Lithographers, 313 F.2d 956 (3 Cir. 1963). See United Bonding Ins. Co. v. Stein, 410 F.2d 483, 486 (3 Cir. 1969).

The appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Kay Anjelino Israel Cabassa Alicia Carranza Joann Coangelo Kathleen Deangelo Margaret Deangelo Eddie Humphrey Sheila Kelly Mark S. Kornblum Robert Laura Stephen W. Maggio Hilary Mendelson Birgitta Mendola Lois Moss Noreen Moss Arthur O'COnnell Milagros Pereira Ruth Richardson Nancy J. Simatos Ellen v. Sims Anastasios Spartos Daniel Stringer Lillian Sullivan Rosa M. Torres Anna Marie Trause v. The New York Times Company Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. New York Mailers' Union No. 6 George McDonald Itu Negotiated Pension Plan (d.c. Civil No. 92-Cv-02582) Kay Anjelino Israel Cabassa Alicia Carranza Jimmy Carroll Joann Coangelo Maureen Conroy Maureen Dolphin Kathleen Deangelo Margaret Deangelo Jackie Fogarty Eddie Humphrey Janet Khoe Sheila Kelly Dennis Knapp Mark S. Kornblum Robert Laura Stephen W. Maggio Hilary Mendelson Birgitta Mendola Lois Moss Noreen Moss Arthur O'COnnell Milagros Pereira Ronald Plakis Ruth Richardson Nancy J. Simatos Ellen v. Sims Anastasios Spartos Daniel Springer Lillian Sullivan Rosa M. Torres Anna Marie Trause v. The New York Times Company Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. New York Mailers' Union No. 6 George McDonald Itu Negotiated Pension Plan (d.c. Civil No. 93-Cv-02870) Kay Anjelino, Israel Cabassa, Alicia Carranza, Joann Coangelo, Kathleen Deangelo, Margaret Deangelo, Eddie Humphrey, Sheila Kelly, Mark S. Kornblum, Robert Laura, Stephen W. Maggio, Hilary Mendelson, Birgitta Mendola, Lois Moss, Noreen Moss, Arthur O'connell, Milagros Pereira, Ruth Richardson, Nancy J. Simatos, Ellen v. Sims, Anastasios Spartos, Daniel Stringer, Lillian Sullivan, Rosa M. Torres and Anna Marie Trause

200 F.3d 73 (Third Circuit, 2000)

Anjelino v. New York Times Co.

200 F.3d 73 (Third Circuit, 1999)

Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance

137 F.3d 148 (Third Circuit, 1998)

Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

137 F.3d 148 (Third Circuit, 1998)

Bruce W. Buzzard, Administrator of the Estate of Deborah S. Buzzard, Bruce W. Buzzard, Individually, and Bruce W. Buzzard, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Lucas Buzzard, a Minor v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc. Roy L. Gerst Freuhauf Trailer Operations, a Division of Terex Trailer Corporations. Freuhauf Trailer Operations Roadrunner Trucking, Inc. And Roy L. Gerst, Cross-Claimants v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc. And Roy L. Gerst, Cross-Defendants, Bruce W. Buzzard

966 F.2d 777 (Third Circuit, 1992)

Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc.

966 F.2d 777 (Third Circuit, 1992)

Brasel v. City of Pierre

211 N.W.2d 846 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1973)

Build of Buffalo, Inc. v. Frank A. Sedita, as Mayor and Chief Executive of the City of Buffalo

441 F.2d 284 (Second Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 F.2d 1293, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1005, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artis-jackson-v-james-a-hart-fbi-gabriel-bergamo-margaret-link-ca3-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack