Artis Charles Harrell v. State
This text of Artis Charles Harrell v. State (Artis Charles Harrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 27, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00753-CR
ARTIS CHARLES HARRELL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 184th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 982,557
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery. Appellant entered a plea of true to an enhancement allegation and was sentenced by the jury to confinement for ninety-nine years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
In his sole issue on appeal, appellant claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress. However, when the evidence was introduced at trial, as State=s Exhibits 6 and 7, defense counsel stated, ANo objection, your Honor.@ Accordingly, any error in the admission of the evidence has been waived despite the pretrial ruling. See Moody v. State, 827 S.W.2d 875, 889 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Hardin v. State, 951 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1997, no pet.). Appellant=s issue is overruled.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 27, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Artis Charles Harrell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artis-charles-harrell-v-state-texapp-2006.