Artis Charles Harrell v. Catherine Verlander Evans
This text of Artis Charles Harrell v. Catherine Verlander Evans (Artis Charles Harrell v. Catherine Verlander Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-21-00666-CV Style: Artis Charles Harrell v. Catherine Verlander Evans et al, Date motion filed*: December 23, 2021 and December 27, 2021 Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions 0 Current Due date: granted: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Contrary to appellant’s request to extend the time to file appellant’s brief, no deadline for the filing of appellant’s brief has been set because the complete appellate record has not yet been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motions for extension as moot.
Judge's signature:______/s/ Sherry Radack___________ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: _____December 30, 2021______
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Artis Charles Harrell v. Catherine Verlander Evans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artis-charles-harrell-v-catherine-verlander-evans-texapp-2021.