Artis Charles Harrell v. Branch Brinson, Individually /Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, R. Burt Brinaom, Individually/ Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, Bonner Brinson, Individual/ Owner/ Corporate Agent Capacity, S.P. Dairy Ashford, LLC D/B/A Salon Park and Brinson Management Corp

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 22, 2018·No. 01-18-00031-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Artis Charles Harrell v. Branch Brinson, Individually /Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, R. Burt Brinaom, Individually/ Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, Bonner Brinson, Individual/ Owner/ Corporate Agent Capacity, S.P. Dairy Ashford, LLC d/b/a Salon Park and Brinson Management Corp

Appellate case number: 01-18-00031-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-28390

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

Artis Charles Harrell, an inmate, appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his underlying civil action as frivolous and malicious, and substantially similar to previous claims filed by appellant based on the same operative facts alleged. On appeal, appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs but has failed to comply with the additional requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code governing inmate litigation. Section 14.004 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides that an inmate who files an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs must file an additional affidavit or declaration identifying each prior lawsuit, other than an action under the Family Code, filed by the inmate without legal representation. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 14.004(a). As to each prior lawsuit, the affidavit or declaration must specify the operative facts, the case name or style, the cause number, the court in which it was brought, the names of the parties, and the result of the suit. Id. If a previous action or claim was dismissed as frivolous or malicious, the affidavit or unsworn declaration of previous filings must state the date of any final judgment or order affirming the dismissal. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 14.004(b). Appellant has not filed an additional affidavit or declaration relating to previous filings. Unless all documents required by Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code are filed within 20 days of the date of this order, this appeal may be dismissed without further notice. See Gozowski v. T.D.C.J.–I.D., No. 12-14-00350-CV, 2014 WL 6983246, *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler Dec. 10, 2014, no pet.); Hickman v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice, No. 13-12-00437-CV, 2013 WL 3770916, at *2 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi July 18, 2013, no pet.); Douglas v. Turner, 441 S.W.3d 337, 339 (Tex. App.—Waco May 9, 2013, no pet.). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown Acting individually

Date: May 22, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Artis Charles Harrell v. Branch Brinson, Individually /Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, R. Burt Brinaom, Individually/ Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, Bonner Brinson, Individual/ Owner/ Corporate Agent Capacity, S.P. Dairy Ashford, LLC D/B/A Salon Park and Brinson Management Corp, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Artis Charles Harrell v. Branch Brinson, Individually /Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, R. Burt Brinaom, Individually/ Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, Bonner Brinson, Individual/ Owner/ Corporate Agent Capacity, S.P. Dairy Ashford, LLC D/B/A Salon Park and Brinson Management Corp (Artis Charles Harrell v. Branch Brinson, Individually /Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, R. Burt Brinaom, Individually/ Owner/Corporate Agent Capacity, Bonner Brinson, Individual/ Owner/ Corporate Agent Capacity, S.P. Dairy Ashford, LLC D/B/A Salon Park and Brinson Management Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ralph O. Douglas v. William Turner
441 S.W.3d 337 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)