Arthur Williams v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 24, 2009
Docket03-09-00268-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Arthur Williams v. State (Arthur Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur Williams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-09-00268-CR

Arthur Williams, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-09-201420, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



Appellant Arthur Williams pled guilty to possession of cocaine in exchange for a two-year sentence and an agreement that federal charges would not be filed. The trial court signed its judgment of conviction on April 29, 2009, and appellant filed his notice of appeal on May 1, 2009. The trial court has certified that the cause is a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. Thus, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).



__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 24, 2009

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Arthur Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-williams-v-state-texapp-2009.