Arthur Williams v. State of Florida
This text of Arthur Williams v. State of Florida (Arthur Williams v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-54 _____________________________
ARTHUR WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel – Original Jurisdiction.
July 24, 2018
PER CURIAM.
DENIED.
LEWIS, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Arthur Williams, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arthur Williams v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-williams-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.