Arthur Wadley v. J. R. Tobacco Company

2 F.3d 1150, 1993 WL 307123
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 5, 1993
Docket93-1326
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2 F.3d 1150 (Arthur Wadley v. J. R. Tobacco Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur Wadley v. J. R. Tobacco Company, 2 F.3d 1150, 1993 WL 307123 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

2 F.3d 1150

63 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 352

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Arthur WADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J. R. TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-1326.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 21, 1993.
Decided: August 5, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-92-153-5-BO)

Arthur Wadley, Appellant Pro Se.

N. Leo Daughtry, Luther Donald Starling, Jr., Daughtry, Woodard & Lawrence, Smithfield, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Wadley appeals from the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wadley v. J. R. Tobacco Company, No. CA-92-153-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karp v. The Fair, Inc.
914 F.2d 253 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F.3d 1150, 1993 WL 307123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-wadley-v-j-r-tobacco-company-ca4-1993.